Does a song define an artist? or does the artist define the song? this question randomly popped into my head. I know my answer but I'm curious what you guys think?
it seems like a silly question at first, but if you actually think about it, it can become kind of complicated in a way.
My opinion is that it's both. In the long run I think they both blend into one if both the artist and song are actually good, but I also think it can go either way. There are some artists that are just sooo good and popular that when they come out with a new song or get featured in a song, a looot of people will like the song right away. ESPECIALLY when fans are bias lol. This makes me think of GD honestly. He has commented on this actually because BigBang is sooo popular, people forget to REALLY listen to the song and just automatically like it cuz its BigBang. So in cases like this the artist basically defines the music. Then there are artist that I think their music defines them. This can be taken in different ways I think. Like the song is really good even though I don't like the artist nessessarily. Or you can go deeper and think of people who are solely and artist for music. This one is kind of hard for me to put into words honestly...but anyways
Overall true music artists are both. There are many less artists that both defined by their music and they also define their music. If that makes sense. Idk maybe I'm just thinking too much and need to go to bed lol. But what do you guys think?