hikaymm
3 years ago1,000+ Views
There's been a potential situation in the world of copyright and copyright claims building for quite a long time.
Is a video of me singing the words to a Beatles song violating copyright? Or does that fall under fair use?
Is it right that a video of me doing a dance cover (to the original song) of a popular Beyonce song could get taken down if her copyright management thought that it should?
I really have no idea, because copyright laws are unclear when it comes to fair use, and in most cases, people just give in to copy right holders rather than get caught up in a legal battle.

Recently, a court ruled against Universal re: copyright.

A Pennsylvania woman uploaded a video of her son dancing in her kitchen while one of Prince's songs played in the background (from her home stereo, not overlaid) back in 2007. Due to a claim by Universal Music, the video was taken down for six weeks. The woman challenged the claim, and it went back up, but she also filed against Universal for the trouble of it being down. Ultimately, she won the case and then, when Universal appealed, she won again.

How the EFF is Changing Things

The reason this case wasn't dropped was because the EFF was footing the bill and encouraging her (and others in her situation) to continue to follow through with claims like these.
"The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading nonprofit organization defending civil liberties in the digital world. Founded in 1990, EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. We work to ensure that rights and freedoms are enhanced and protected as our use of technology grows."
Thanks to the EFF, people are actually pushing back for reasonable fair use exceptions to copyrights. Usually, the problem isn't that courts are unwilling to rule on this. It's that pretty much every case gets settled out of court.

What's The Issue?

Basically, there are too many staffers out there working under the big music labels that are being too strict in their use of copyright laws. All they have to do is submit a claim to Youtube, and the video is down. While I understand that copyright infringement is a big deal and should be taken seriously, videos like this one --where the music is simply incidental and does not appear to have been picked specifically--should not be taken down.
I believe that copyright holders need to start properly considering fair use, and copyright laws need to be adjusted to provide more avenues for those who want to use and appreciate a song in their Youtube videos. Fine if they are not able to monetize the videos, but the take down system that is currently in place is out of line when it comes to many fair use videos!
10 comments
Suggested
Recent
@nicolejb sure! And I think the one you linked me to definitely counts as a reimagining. Even stuff that takes no skill (like just mash cutting two videos together, that's not difficult with today's technology), I think if it's expressing a new idea, or re-contextualizing the original media, it's not plagiarism. It's cashing in on the cultural currency the original media had, sure, but it's not really stealing. If anything, it's often adding to the conversation
totally @shannonl5, I think because it takes on a new creative meaning, and it requires at least some skill to do!
I followed this case because the OTW submitted some info in support of the EFF. I do think there needs to be some support for the artists creating and sharing their work- especially indie artists who don't have millions of dollars rolling in every time they release an album. They need to be able to protect their work so they can support themselves and keep creating more. But a lot of the time these copyright violations are for artists that don't really need that protection anymore. After a certain point, it seems like some art (film, music, books, whatever) need to belong to the whole world. Having access to others' work and the ability to remix and transform it into something else is better for the artistic community than taking it away
I find this stuff SO interesting! I actually studied Communication Law for a bit, so copyright and freedom of speech is my JAM. I think in terms of creative use, we are ever changing and morphing and recreating...essentially the creative world is changing, and I think people have the right to use this stuff as long as something new and creative value can be taken out of it. :) Essentially, I am a fan of EFF.
@shannonl5 @nicolejb I love the way both of you think about it, it's very similar to how I feel about most copyright infringements. If you aren't just using the song to make a profit without crediting paying for it (like in a movie), and you're doing something new and creative with it I really think that's a big part of the music. Some artists can't understand that just like they used other people's work to learn, they should be willing to share theirs (to a reasonable extent), too.
View more comments
6
10
3