a year ago
rmayra1
in English · 1,729 Views
likes 17clips 6comments 2
history of a star
What if Hyun Joong is the victim? (ENG/ESP)
ENG:
Choi did a lot of damage, and Hyun Joong doesn't want to see her anymore (which is natural when a person leaves a circle of violence)
What if Choi was the one who constantly assaulted Hyun Joong?
What If Choi Was the one who wrote those messages saying “it was a part of that I hadn't seen in a while” “how are your bruises?” to Hyun Joong …
And was who said “will never happen again” and Hyun Joong agreed to those apologies? because he thought it would be the last time...
What if Hyun Joong was involved in a circle of violence and when he wanted to get out, she started to say she was pregnant or she had aborted?We could actually see Hyun Joong’s bruises … but could we see Choi’s?
And what about Hyun Joong hidden in dark, with a candle, because she might be outside his door… Isn’t that the profile of an assaulted person??
I guess Hyun Joong is the victim here ..
...........1- On 24 Sep. Choi's side submitted file for paternaty law suit to family court.
2- Regard to criminal suit against Choi:
Attny Lee said police investigation will be started after holiday,end of Sep. It will take 2~3 mons.-->> seems they r under urgent situation.EN: Ok! In a previous post I said that I won't upload Choi's new pictures that she summited to court with her "bruises". But I think it is necessary, why? .. because she said she was with Hyun Joong in those pictures and... be honest with.. don't you think there are something fishy in those pics?? or am I to blind?
By the way, Seon (Choi's lawyer) said that those pictures were take 2-3 days before Jeju Island trip un June last year.... But, still those pics DON'T PROVE that Hyun Joong hit her.tt.Lee Interview 2015.09.24 (ENG/ESP)
Q:A's witness?
AttyL: July10assault case completd last yr by sttlmnt n not litigation issue, so witnss was denied.
Q:What does it mean KHJ admitd abortion inJuly last yr?
AttyL:KHJwas told n thot she had abortions in May/Jul/Dec
Per statement of fact returned, there was a record of abortion in July.
Q: why 4th hearing?
AttyL: Choi's side said they have so many text msgs n need time to process them.
Q:If enuf evdncs, why is 4th hearing set
Seon:bcuz d accused's side.. we intend2file paternity suit, I dnt know why d accused is denying it.
(This point has no sense: The 4ª hearing is not for paternity issue, is for last year pregnancies/aborts issues. Seon has no idea what case it is. Too weird for a lawyer, dont you think?From the 3º hearing. 2015.09.23 (ENG/ESP)
1AttyL:Aside submtd textmsgs n no med-recrds dis time2. Txtmsgs r not evdnce4prgncy but imprtnt evdnc of her lies2HJ
2-1 AttyLee on court response: 'Can they b evidence?, Can d witness b evidence?' Court was skeptic n didn't accept witness &
2-2 AttyLee on court response: regarding txt msgs, it was sthng like that court will hold another hearing day to have them organized.
1- AttyL: "It seems its der tactic to drag d litigation to 4th hearing in order to bring out negotiations for criminal lawsuit. [DailySports]
2- AttyL: Txt msgs, thou large amnt, dont hv authority of 1 medi-cert. Its favrbl 2us when dey hv more txt msgs. Only txts prove nothing.
3- AttyL:Ders 1material fr July abortion. A told KHJ she was prgnt in JulySeptDec n he believd her. Per statmnt of fact, ders abortion inJuly
4- AttyL: She talked abt abortion in Dec n got 6BW fr compensation but ders no material in this regard. [per DailySports]
5- Aside submttd text msgs n txts wth friends, abortion materials.
Court set 4th hearing due2huge amnt of materials n sm matrls unorganized yet
6- Bruise on left arm? Right arm? [A's new pic has bruise on right arm, thou old pic has on left.
(I won’t put the picture here, but the picture is very dark (not in a hospital), the bruise doesn’t see clearly and of course doesn't prove HJ hit her, it’s just a picture.

.)
7- A still sues fans even now!!!!! WTH!!!!!!
8- Seon: my clients is so pity that raing baby all alone. when I think of hr, that made me cry.
EN: Ok! In a previous post I said that I won't upload Choi's new pictures that she summited to court with her "bruises". But I think it is necessary, why? .. because she said she was with Hyun Joong in those pictures and... be honest with.. don't you think there are something fishy in those pics?? or am I to blind?
By the way, Seon (Choi's lawyer) said that those pictures were take 2-3 days before Jeju Island trip un June last year.... But, still those pics DON'T PROVE that Hyun Joong hit her.
rmayra1 clipped in 1 collections
2 comments
oh my god. of all people why is it the pose people. I mean seriously what did Kim hyung do to deserve this. this gold digger is going to ruin his name. no matter what Kim hyung deserves justice.