shannonl5
2 years ago5,000+ Views

This week's throwback Thursday: Playboy comes to Black Widow's defense.

Some of you might remember that I was less than thrilled with the superhero film offerings this year. Fantastic Four was a trainwreck, Ant-Man was fun but not particularly exciting, and Age of Ultron seemed like it was stuck in the middle of a tug of war between the studio and the director. Some fans were pretty unhappy with the story line Black Widow had in AoU, and Playboy was her unlikely advocate. After two of her co-stars called Scarlett Johannson's character a slut, the magazine called out Hollywood for their bare minimum representation for women (Via).

"It may seem odd to say that Black Widow’s gender is unusual; she’s a cis, heterosexual woman, with a Hollywood-standard glamorous feminine appearance. But look around the first Avengers film, and you will see that women, no matter how conventionally Hollywood, are in awfully short supply."

Preach.
"And as the lone superheroine, she becomes, narratively, inevitably, sexualized and available. Fans can write barrels of bytes of fanfic in which Tony Stark and Captain America have torrid sex and more torrid sex with each other, but in the canon, homosexuality is rarely considered a real option. And that leaves Black Widow as the one object of desire for — well, for everyone."
We talked a bit about the Smurfette Principle this summer (often our media will have a cast made up entirely of men with one token woman, implying that men lead multifaceted lives while women rarely get the same opportunity). Because in terms of the story, female characters often don't get characterization, they're too busy being prizes or plot devices.

So way to be Playboy.

Sure, their business is based on selling the sexualization of women. But even they seem to know that's not the only thing women have to offer. Which is why they're getting my Throwback Thursday kudos!
13 comments
View more comments
@LadyLuna it's really frustrating because you're right, nobody was saying stuff like that about Tony Stark despite the established relationships that he has with multiple people. not that anyone should be saying stuff like that at all- there's nothing to be ashamed of. But it is a double standard. Why is it ok for Tony but not Natasha?
2 years ago·Reply
@shannonl5 Exactly!!! That's the whole a guy could "do" multiple girls in one night and he's God but a chick who "does" multiple guys in one night she's a slut... its like grrrrr! So uncool...
2 years ago·Reply
@LadyLuna well not only that, but it kind of leaves the guys in a tough place right? I mean if the ladies aren't supposed to be having sex and the guys are.... seems a bit counter-intuitive, eh? ;)
2 years ago·Reply
@shannonl5 True true!! And why would a guy want a chick just as awesome as him. Bcuz she won't need "rescuing" she can save herself! So I guess according to that bcuz she can save herself she don't need a man?! maybe that's where that comes from...hmmm.
2 years ago·Reply
@LadyLuna yup the entire thing is just full of contradictions and it would be funny if people didn't buy into it. But people absorb it and assume that this is 'normal' behavior when it's really not.
2 years ago·Reply
41
13
10