kpopINT
a year ago500+ Views
NCT under controversy again!!

Hey guys

So recently there has been fire added to the controversy and issues surrounding NCT members. Aside from Taeyong's past scamming scandal a new member is now under the looking glass and receiving negative attention. A Chinese trainee member who was preparing to debut soon is now under heavy controversy because "According to fans the alleged trainee sent nude photos and videos of himself or porn message to many fans" - allkpop.com Here are some of the alleged pictures ( I tried to cover as much as I could)
Fans are demanding that the member not debut under SM Entertainment and both Korean and Chinese fans are voicing their opinions on the situation. Neither SM or the trainee has released any opinion or statement on the subject. And we still don't know how this will affect NCT and its members.

What do you guys think? Should he debut or not? Do we need to stop looking into people's past lives or is this something that needs to be addressed sternly? Let us know down in the comments!

All the pictures have credit to their respective owners none are owned by KpopINT


20 Like
6 Share
10 comments
View more comments
Who is it?!
a year agoReply
Omg I swear here we go again he did that when he was younger and if him and the girl were both sending them then who cares
a year agoReply
I wouldn't be upset at all馃槒
a year agoReply
The past is the past, let it go. He has worked hard since and should not lose it all over some poor judgement. This constant scrutiny of these kids is getting old. Don't these so called Netizens have anything better to do than try to ruin other peoples lives. He who is without sin, cast the first stone, all others shut the f#!k up and get a life.
a year agoReply
so what's the Deal with NCT U that people are getting so upset about? like why can't we just like them and their music and go from there, why are there ppl bringing all this stuff up? like what is their real issue with this group that they have to keep bringing up the past?
a year agoReply
20
10
6