delmontequality
5 years ago5,000+ Views
A 2005 study found that the scores of "wine experts" are essentially meaningless, revealing that a typical judge's scoring of a wine varied by plus/minus four points over three blind tastings poured from the same bottle.
6 comments
Suggested
Recent
In my opinion +/- 4 points out of 100 seems pretty reasonable, especially since most wines will change with exposure to air. jmo
all products that are branded are like this
not saying the scam is the wine, but the scam is the taster's scores or their 'expertise'
well not really, is it a scam to buy luxury goods?
so its all just a big scam!
View more comments
14
6
3