50+ Views

Compensation claim for Bouncers Failure to Anticipate and Prevent Violence

Violence in pubs, clubs and hotels is becoming increasingly prevalent in Australia.

Compensation claims being made by victims of violence in licensed premises is also on the up.

Compensation claims where security guards have used excessive force resulting in the injury and/or death of a patron have been well documented in recent years. In attempting to diffuse and control potentially violent situations, it has often been the bouncers themselves who have caused patrons to suffer injury.

There have also been compensation claims awarded to victims injured by other patrons in circumstances where the security guards were incompetent and/or negligent in dealing with a violent or dangerous situation.
The NSW Supreme Court recently decided the matter of Orcher v Bowcliff Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1088, where the injured claimant was awarded almost $1.4 million after being king hit by another patron out the front of a licensed premises.

Orcher v Bowcliff Pty Ltd
At 4.50 am on 25 November 2007, claimant John Orcher was king hit by Tamiano Paseka outside of the Rozelle Bridge Hotel. As a result of the punch, Orcher fell backwards and hit his head on a footpath, suffering a serious brain injury.
Security guards employed by the hotel watched the incident unfold between the patrons from the front of the hotel but failed to act in any way to prevent the incident from escalating in the first place.

In his judgement, Justice Harrison of the NSW Supreme Court found that the security guards have a duty to anticipate and prevent violence. He noted that the incident slowly unfolded before the very eyes of onlooking security guards and considered that it was a breach of (their) duty to do nothing at all.
Justice Harrison explained that the bouncers were aware that the potential for violence between the patrons was escalating for a period of two and a half minutes before the assault occurred – during which the bouncers failed to intervene in any way.
The claimant was awarded $1.4 million dollars in compensation for injuries suffered.


The decision of the NSW Supreme Court proffers stern warning to licensed premises and security companies that their staff must be trained and competent in both anticipating and preventing violent situations at their premises. Further, it maintains that security guards may be required to act even in circumstances where the violence takes place outside of the relevant premises.

The decision may yet be appealed.

Read More:
Cards you may also be interested in
Know more about the extradition laws of British Nationals in the UAE
An extradition request can be understood as an action wherein one sovereign jurisdiction delivers a person either acquitted or convicted of an international crime to the law enforcement of another jurisdiction upon their official request. Compliance with an extradition request involves transferring the physical custody of the accused person to the legal authority of the requesting jurisdiction. The jurisdiction that makes the extradition request is known as the “requesting state,” and the jurisdiction to which the extradition request has been placed is called the “requested state”. Extradition law in itself is a cooperative law and much depends on international covenants, regional or bilateral treaties entered into between the nations, and routine procedures followed for extradition. In the absence of a specific extradition treaty, another sovereign nation cannot be forced to comply with the extradition request. However, in the light of increasing international crimes majority of countries have entered into international treaties to support extradition procedures. Hence, in the instances wherein extradition is being allowed, the procedures can be broadly explained as follows, the requested jurisdiction conduct a search for the requested fugitive, and if the fugitive is found within the territory of the requested jurisdiction, then arrest is proceeded with and the next steps for extradition is initiated. All the procedures that apply to the extradition occur generally as per the law and practice of the requested state. More about the extradition process in the UAE: The extradition process generally comprises of the following steps: The requesting jurisdiction submits its request through the Attorney General to the Ministry of justice for the requesting jurisdiction. One such request is received, the Ministry of justice would proceed to send the request to the Ministry of foreign affairs (MOFA) of the requesting jurisdiction, which will then proceed to transfer the request to the respective embassy of the requesting jurisdiction located in the capital of the requested jurisdiction. From the embassy, further steps of communication are initiated with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the requested jurisdiction, which would then finally transfer the request to the Ministry of Justice for the requested jurisdiction. The UAE has issued federal law no. 39 of 2006 on the ‘Mutual judicial cooperation in criminal matters’ (Extradition law). In addition, the UAE is a signatory of the Riyadh Arab Convention on Judicial cooperation before the countries of Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Iraq, Algeria, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Tunisia and Morocco. UAE has entered into bilateral treaties for judicial cooperation with United Kingdom, France, India, Pakistan, Iran, Australia, China, Egypt, Kazakhstan etc. Article 7 of the said Extradition law puts forward the ground upon which an extradition request is accepted in the UAE, and it includes: The surrender of requested persons is conditional upon: 1. The crime for which the surrender is requested must be penalized by the Law of the requesting State to imprisonment of at least one year or any other greater penalty. 2. The act for which the surrender is requested must constitute; in the territories of the State, a crime penalized by imprisonment of at least one year or any other greater penalty. 3. If the request for surrender is related to the service of a sentence of imprisonment rendered in any of the crimes for which the surrender is requested, the remaining period of the sentence to be served must not be less than six months in order for the surrender to be performed. 4. Shall have no effect on the determination whether the act for which the surrender of a person is requested constitutes a penalized crime in the Laws of the two States, that the crime be mentioned under a different name or description or should their elements differ from each other. The extradition process in the UAE allows for a challenge to be put forward for extradition by making the request through the following entities as per the order of authority and procedure: The local law enforcement authorities, Public prosecution office, the court of appeals, the Cassation Courts, the Ministry of Justice. Pursuant to the extradition treaty between the United Kingdom and the UAE: Article 4(1) of the said extradition treaty states the grounds upon which an extradition request can be refused, and this includes: Article 4: Grounds for refusal of extraditionExtradition shall not be granted under this Treaty in any of the following cases: a. If the Requested Party has substantial grounds for believing that the request for extradition has been made for the purpose of prosecuting or punishing a person on account of that person’s race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinions, sex or status. b. If the person sought has been tried and convicted or acquitted by a final judgement in either State or in a third state of the offence for which extradition is requested. c. When the prosecution of the person sought would be barred by lapse of time under the domestic law of the Requested Party. (d) If the offence for which extradition has been requested is a military offence and not also an offence under ordinary domestic criminal law. d. Where extradition would breach the person’s human rights in accordance with the domestic law of the Requested Party. e. If the person has been convicted in absentia, unless an assurance is provided that the person will be entitled to a retrial or appeal amounting to retrial under the domestic law of the Requesting Party. f. Where extradition is barred for any other reason under the domestic law of the Requested Party. According to uae Law if there is contradiction between the signed treaty and the uae extradition laws then the treaty should be the one to supersedes the local laws.
Canberra Criminal Defence Lawyer
A person accused of these crimes has the right to represent himself in court. If the individual decides to defend himself, their conviction may be upheld, and they may face a lengthy jail sentence, depending on the nature of their crime. Of course, one of these attorneys' primary goals is to ensure that their clients receive a light sentence for the crime they committed. Although a person has the right to represent himself in court, it is not advisable to do so. Many people who want to represent themselves will find themselves stretched in ways they never imagined. What will a criminal defense lawyer do? A qualified criminal lawyer is required to defend corporations or individuals who have been accused of such criminal behavior. Every individual has the right to speak for oneself in a court of law, but expert assistance is always required. Before hiring a criminal lawyer, the track record of the individual should always be considered. It would be a risk to choose the wrong individual to represent the case. When settling on criminal counsel, one must use caution. He must be knowledgeable and experienced. Before hiring a criminal lawyer, it is a good idea to consult with a lawyer. What is the criminal’s responsibility? A Canberra criminal defense lawyer will do all in their power to help the accused get a fresh start. They'll speak with witnesses to the criminal offense for which their client is being accused, and they'll keep all police officer documents proving that their client committed the crime for which they are being accused. The lawyer should conduct extensive research on your case in order to persuade the jury that you are not guilty of the criminal allegations leveled against you. Even if you aren't guilty, your lawyer will do everything possible to help you achieve a reduced sentence. Some Basic reasons The primary reason why many people choose not to hire a criminal defense lawyer to represent them in a criminal case is that they believe they do not have enough money to pay for representation. Before deciding whether or not to represent oneself in a court of law, you should carefully consider all of the benefits and drawbacks of your options. Remember that paying a modest fee to a criminal defense lawyer to help you erase the criminal accusations brought against you is more preferable to pleading your case in front of a judge and jury. How we can find dependable Canberra Criminal Defence Lawyers? A legal adviser's recommendation might be quite useful in locating a reputable criminal lawyer. Personal recommendations, advertisements, and other methods can be used to discover a good criminal lawyer. When a lawyer investigates a case, he looks into all of the possible outcomes. A criminal lawyer may have to appear in court several times if necessary. A lawyer with sufficient competence and knowledge battles to ensure that the client's rights are protected. In other words, he should ensure that his client is treated fairly and that justice is done in the end. He is required to vigorously and diligently represent his client. He should properly collect and research the material in order to show his client's innocence. Most important Point A client hires a criminal lawyer to protect him from the hands of the law. Throughout his practice, a criminal lawyer deals with a variety of offenders. If a defendant has any prior criminal histories, he must disclose them and be fully informed of all relevant circumstances. In other words, he should not withhold any critical information from him. When the lawyer ensures transparency, the remainder of the process becomes much easier. A lawyer's strength is unquestionably his dedication. A criminal observer must be astute and perceptive in his observations. He will not be successful unless he submits a high-quality article.
Drug Trafficking Laws in Dubai
The United Arab Emirates has a no-tolerance policy when it comes to drug trafficking. The Federal Law no. 14 of 1995 on ‘the control of narcotics and psychotropic substances and its amendments commonly referred to as the ‘Drug law’ criminalizes the production, import, export, transport, buying, selling, storing, and possessing of narcotic and psychotropic substances in the UAE. Pursuant to Article 39 of the UAE drug law, ‘Whoever abuses in any manner, possesses with the intention of abuse or personally uses in the circumstances other than those authorized any narcotic or psychotropic substances set forth in schedules 1, 2, 4 and 5 enclosed herewith shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a period of two years at least. ‘The court may, in addition to the said penalty, impose a fine amounting to ten thousand Dirhams at least. When the narcotic or psychotropic substances are classified under schedule 3 ,6, 7 or 8 of the UAE drugs laws then pursuant to Article 40 , the punishment could include imprisonment of 6 months to two years along with the fine of up to 10,000 dirhams. Article 40(1) of the UAE drugs law state that, ‘Whoever abuses in any manner, possesses with the intention of abuse or personally uses in circumstances other than those authorized any narcotic or psychotropic substance provided for in schedules 3, 6, 7 and 8 enclosed herewith shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a period of six months at least and two years at most. The court may, in addition to the said penalty, impose a fine amounting to ten thousand Dirhams at least’. When the offender is a foreigner, then additional deportation will also apply once the sentence is served. This is pursuant to article 63 of the said law, which states, ‘In addition to the sanctions set forth herein, the foreigner convicted in any of the crimes set forth herein shall be deported by virtue of a court order.’ It is a key point to understand is that the UAE courts establish the crime of drug trafficking when a person is guilty possessing of drugs. As established in UAE cassation court decisions, the crime of drug tracking is establishing if the accused is found guilty of both possessing and supplying the drugs, irrespective of whether the accused consumed the drugs or not. This constitutes ample proof for the detention of the accused, and hence any defense of non -consumption of drugs proves irrelevant before the courts. The UAE police have dedicated departments to deal with drugs' issues. In recent years the UAE has taken many progressive measures to handle drug abuse in society. The most progressive step includes the amendments to article 43 of the UAE drug laws effected in 2016, which states that no criminal proceedings will be instituted against a drug abuser when the person voluntarily presents themselves to the investigative authorities and seeks treatment. Article 43. 1. No criminal proceedings shall be instituted against any abuser of narcotics or psychotropic substances who voluntarily presents himself or is presented by his/her spouse or one of his/her relatives to the second degree to an addiction treatment unit, the Public Prosecution or the police requesting treatment in the unit. The abuser shall remain in the unit until it takes the decision to release him. 2. In cases where the abuser is not confined to the Public Prosecution, the confining entity must obtain the Public Prosecution’s approval upon the abuser confinement, release, non-commitment to the plan of treatment, or failure to hand over narcotic substances in his possession to take the necessary actions for the institution of the criminal proceedings. 3. The provision of clause (1) of this Article shall not apply to the abuser whom the unit deems he/she did not commit to the prescribed treatment plan. 4. The period of treatment and rehabilitation shall not exceed two years.
Does Federal Law Surpass NY State Workers’ Compensation Law
Many people are afraid to commence a workers’ compensation claim due to immigration status.  In New York, the law does not discriminate.  Even if your legal status is in question, you still can qualify for workers’ compensation benefits.  Many insurance carriers do not even ask immigration status of a claimant; however, it is possible that an insurance carrier may inquire.  It is important to know that while some Judges do not allow for this type of questioning others will allow the insurance carrier to inquire about status.  Nevertheless, even if your status is in question, you can still receive workers’ compensation benefits.   Another hot topic where State and Federal law may conflict in workers’ compensation cases Is medical marijuana. Medical marijuana is covered under NY State Workers’ Compensation. This is made possible through the Compassionate Care Act.  The Compassionate Care Act allows for those with serious health conditions to receive medical marijuana.  Medical marijuana can also be used to help with opioid weaning.  However, since marijuana is still illegal federally, certain guidelines apply.  For instance, federal insurance carriers will not pay for or reimburse for medical marijuana prescribed by a certified doctor.  However, state-based insurance carriers, or self-insured employers have paid to cover the expenses of medical marijuana. This is an ongoing battle being litigated between injured workers and insurance carriers.     There is recent case law directing an insurance carrier to reimburse a claimant for prescribed medical marijuana.  Matter of WDF, (2018 NY Work Comp G140803). This case does give direction through that the prescription must be properly requested through a medical variance.  A variance must be submitted by an approved doctor due to medical marijuana not being addressed in the medical treatment guidelines.   Unlike other medication associated with a workers’ comp claim, medical marijuana is not paid for by the insurance carrier prior to picking up medication.  A claimant must pay for the medical marijuana and submit a reimbursement request to the insurance carrier.  Once again federal insurance carriers are not reimbursing for same.  Besides medical marijuana there are many other prescriptions a medical provider can prescribe to help with serious health conditions.  Many of these medications are controlled substances or opioids.  There are guidelines for each of these medications and what is an approved dosage.  Some of these medications need preapproval.  Preapproval is needed when a medication cannot be found on the NY Workers’ Compensation Formulary.  If a medication is denied the parties, try to reach an agreement on what medication or dosage is appropriate and if not a hearing is requested for a Judge to address.  New York State Worker’s Compensation laws do allow for some safeguarding when dealing with federal laws. 
Covid-19 Impact On Debt Collection in UAE
It is certainly an arduous exercise and shocking to ascertain the overall impact of coronavirus on the life of the individuals and the economy of the world. We have experienced and are continuously experiencing the restrictions imposed by the government on various sectors to prevent further spread of the virus and safeguard the society. One of the primary restrictions imposed by the government of UAE was the suspension of court services, which is gradually coming back in service. Commercial Lawyers of Dubai are of the view that such restrictions imposed by the government are even though in favour of the society at large, yet pose a grave tension among the creditors claiming outstanding debt, in the situation of the market is slow. It is expected and is witnessed that the default rates of debtors will increase due to restrictions imposed on conducting businesses and creditors will be left at limited options to collect the outstanding debt from the market. Ergo, it is the time to gather all information and strategize plans to recover debts with the help of Top Lawyers of Dubai. In general, a debtor has several options in UAE to initiate actions for debt collection, for instance, serving a legal notice to the other party through the assistance of a Legal Consultant in Dubai. The legal notices are issued with an intent to resolve the dispute outside the court authorities' jurisdiction and is an amicable way of resolving the issue or claiming the debt owed by the other party. In most circumstances, the parties are unwilling to approach the court considering the cost involved in legal cases and the timeline to reach a judgment. However, we have seen major amendments in the civil law as explained in our articles concerning amendments in Civil Procedure Law, wherein establishment of fast-track judicial authorities allows the parties to execute the orders without notice for payment orders. Such remedies can be well utilized in these difficult times to expedite the cases for outstanding debt. At this stage, we advise all our readers who are in a tough spot of claiming outstanding debt from their debtors, you can either immediately act upon it by highlighting the outstanding debt and offering an opportunity to the debtor to come forward and reach a negotiated amount, or you may wait until the current global crisis settles down. However, a laid back approach is only advised if you are aware of strong financial position of your debtor and you believe you will be able to recover your debt without the debtor filing for bankruptcy or insolvency. In any of the event, the best approach is to conduct small due diligence on company's (debtor) financial position in the COVID-19 situation and accordingly must take suitable action of serving a legal notice or approaching the court to file a case. In cases, where you are uncertain if the company (the debtor) will survive this unfortunate turn of events, it is very much advised by the Lawyers of Dubai to immediately resort to legal assistance, before it's too late as the court are re-operational and are using virtual technology to register and attend hearings for which your Civil Lawyer can assist you with.
The most common work injuries in America
Statistically, there are a specific group of jobs in the United States that generate the most work injuries. They mainly exist in the fields of construction, manufacturing, gardening, cleaning, cooking, caring for the disabled and agriculture. These types of workplaces can unfortunately be a hot bed for abusive employers, who often take advantage of employees’ fear, immigration status, or lack of workers’ rights knowledge. These jobs, in addition, can generate great physical and mental wear on those who perform them for long periods of time.  Repetitive Strain Work Injuries A worker who must carry out the same action repeatedly day after day can suffer work injuries from this cause. For example, a construction worker may develop chronic knee pain from transporting equipment at work. On the other hand, office workers can suffer repetitive strain injury in carpal tunnel syndrome mode from using a keyboard all day. Overexertion Some workers can suffer chronic pain, muscle or tendon tears, and other debilitating injuries from overexertion. It is common for workers to make excessive movements when trying to lift heavy objects. Bone fracture OSHA has reported that falls of people and objects from heights are two of the leading causes of fatal accidents in the construction industry, so it is not surprising that broken bones are the most common workplace injuries in commercial accidents.  Traumatic brain injury (TBI) A worker who falls and is struck by an object or is trapped in machinery can suffer a TBI. Any worker who suffers a work-related accident that could cause a brain injury of any kind should receive immediate medical attention. Burns Electrocutions and burns are also on OSHA's list of the most common fatal injuries in the construction industry. People who survive an electrocution can suffer third degree burns that leave permanent scars. Likewise, burns can be caused by open flames, hot surfaces and caustic chemicals generating irreversible damage. They say the best way to control a hazard is to eliminate it, although there are certain jobs that are dangerous in nature. That is why it is important to know that an injury is defined as direct physical damage to one’s part of a body from a particular cause. A work injury is considered to be a specific damage or occupational disease related to the work performed by the worker. Additionally, it can also be a long-term physical or mental injury progressively developed by the worker; but it must always be related to the usual tasks performed by the employee.
How Do Schools Respond to Migrant Children?
The people from the new community always neglect migrant people. They don’t cope with the migrant, knowing they are the outsiders who haven’t got the citizenships yet. However, even if they get citizenship, it always becomes challenging to cooperate with the regular citizens around. The same difficulties face the migrant children in a new country. Migrant children always feel the horror, isolation, frustration, and negative energy growing in their minds. They are surrounded by the regular students who make the migrants feel abandoned, hateful, and bullied. As a result, the situation doesn’t come up friendly and ends up in terrorism. Migrant children may sometimes get involved in wrongdoings for their existence since they are neglected here. They may want to make their standard of living to cope with others. There come several outcomes. Some can attempt wrongdoings against the bullies, some may stay quiet and let them oppress, and others look for support from the authority. It’s challenging to get the immigration process to run smoothly. Though the children and parents may seek lawyers’ help, the procedure is also challenging. The school teachers are not also supportive in tracking the migrant children’s numbers since the immigration status is hanging in most cases. The federal law requires educating and enrol kids regardless of the immigration status. But it’s been challenging to get support from co-students and teachers, as well. It’s always suggested to contact the Kansas City immigration attorney to get legal support during the immigration process. At least, the students can have the back in any severity. Most children don’t even feel like talking or sharing their conditions inside the school backyard because they are too frustrated. It’s time the migrants should be treated gently. Their green card or citizenship procedure may take time, but they are here with paperwork and legally. However, the time’s been changing. People are trying to cooperate and help migrants in need. But the students or children who are a bit aggressive should stop bullying the migrants in no time.
Dog Bite Lawyer
There are over 4.5 million people who suffer dog bite attacks every year.  In 2018, there were roughly 76 million dogs in the U.S. Every household on average had, 1.6 dogs. This can suggest a higher number of bites for the entire year. Dogs that were abused or mistreated in animal shelters may be traumatized, which causes them to attack. It was reported that, 800,000 of the dog bites needed medical attention. The chances of dying from a doc attack or bite is 1 in 112,400. If a dog isn’t neutered this increases a dog’s potential to bite someone to 70%. Heredity, sex, and reproductive status of a dog are just a few essential factors in determining whether a dog will be aggressive or not.  If you find yourself in a dog bite accident, there are immediate steps that you need to take. You should seek medical attention because of the bite. There are infections or rabies that can infect a person if a dog bites you. Rabies is a deadly virus that spreads to people from the saliva of infected animals. The rabies virus is usually transmitted through a bite. Symptoms of a rabies infection include, fever, headache, salivation, muscle spasms, paralysis, and mental confusion. If the dog belongs to an owner at a house, this will be considered a premises accident. You will be able to pursue a lawsuit against the owner who will be liable for damages. Contact a top dog bite lawyer to help you with your case.  Children are high risk to dog attacks and are more likely to die from the injuries. There were 33 fatalities in a single recent year. Regarding kids, dog bites are the second most common injury requiring medical attention, next to playground accidents. Many of the dog bites that happen involves domestic, not stray dogs. When a dog attack happens, there are laws in New York that allow dog victims to recover damages from the attacking dog’s owner under most circumstances. There are situations where homeowner’s insurance will cover dog bite incidents.  If you are injured, make sure to gather any witness testimony from other individuals and any police report if they are called. These pieces of evidences will help your case dramatically. You should also take any photos of the attacking dog, and an address or location that the dog was found in. Contacting a professional dog bite lawyer will be the deciding factor in your compensation amount.