2 years ago
SakuraBlossom96
in English · 3,590 Views
likes 4clips 2comments 4
Canadian Judge refuses to hear case of a Muslim woman because of her hijab
Canadian Judge Refuses To Hear Case Of A Muslim Woman Because Of Her Hijab A Quebec judge told the single mother that she was “not suitably dressed” for court.         A Quebec judge told Rania El-Alloul that she would not hear her case in a Montreal courtroom unless she removed her hijab, CBC News reported. El-Alloul, a single mother of three boys, told CBC News that the first question Judge Eliana Marengo asked her in court was, “why are you putting this scarf on your head?” El-Alloul said she told the judge that she was a Muslim. In a court recording obtained by CBC News, the judge told El-Alloul: “In my opinion, the courtroom is a secular place and secular space. There are no religious symbols in this room, not on the walls and not on the persons.” Marengo cited a Quebec court regulation which states that a person in court must be “suitably dressed” and told El-Alloul she was not. “I will therefore not hear you if you are wearing a headscarf on your head just as I would not allow a person to appear before me wearing a hat or sunglasses on his or her head…” the judge told El-Alloul. El-Alloul was in court to make a request to get her car back after police seized it from one of her sons, who was allegedly driving with a suspended license. The judge took a 30 minute recess after which she gave gave El-Alloul two options: remove her hijab or apply for a postponement order to consult a lawyer. El-Alloul responded that she could not remove her scarf which she had been wearing for many years. When Marengo offered to suspend the case until El-Alloul found a lawyer, the single mother said she could not afford one. “I’m on welfare by the way,” El-Alloul said. “I’m separated. I’m living with three boys. I’m facing many problems.” Marengo replied: “I know that, but that’s not what I’m talking about.” In a 2012 ruling on whether a witness could wear a niqab (full-face veil), the Supreme Court of Canada said it would be determined on a case-to-case basis. “I felt that I’m not Canadian anymore,” said El-Alloul, who came to Canada from Kuwait 12 years ago. “I cried too much,” El-Alloul told CBC News after she had to return home without her car. “From yesterday night I’m crying.” She said that the first day she landed in Canada she was wearing her hijab. “”When I swore by God to be a good Canadian citizen I was wearing my hijab, and the judge, I shook hands with him the same day I became Canadian. I was really very happy. But what happened in court made me feel afraid. I felt that I’m not Canadian anymore,” El-Alloul said. ----------------------------------------------- How ridiculous is it to have a title in which you're supposed to up-hold the law & in turn, go against your title and what you stand for? Clearly I am outraged to hear such a thing, so much for moving towards greater things since we're all such a civilized, modern, open minded society as a whole.
SakuraBlossom96 clipped in 1 collections
4 comments
Hmm, I have to agree with El-Alloul here. Even though I highly agree that the courts should be and should remain secular places, that does not mean forcing everyone out of their religious beliefs as well. Are Catholics forced to remove any cross necklaces or rosary beads if they happen to have them? I don't think so. While the court shouldnt' show religious symbols, individuals in the court shouldn't be held to these rules.
I don't know enough about Muslim culture to know this, but are hijabs actually considered to be a religious symbol? I understand not wanting someone to walk in carrying a big cross as it's a symbol of the religious, but a hijab isn't a symbol of the religious itself, but an effect of the religion.
@drwhat Not to come off as rude or anything, but rather show some insight, wearing the hijab is, in fact, an obligation of Islam. I know this as a friend of a hijabi. I understand that courts require appropriate apparel but wearing a hijab is not simply an accessory, therefore ordering Rania to take it off is irrelevant and offensive. In addition the judge was obviously racist for focusing on that certain factor rather than the case itself. How can you ask someone to give up a piece of what they stand for when no one has asked you to do so? Not to mention how can the judge pretend to do this in an effort to do her job, when she can't even remain unbiased.
@SakuraBlossom96 It didn't come off as rude at all, don't worry. I agree completely: just because what she is wearing is a religious symbol to her (and thus shouldnt' be required to be taken off), doesn't mean she is forcing it on everyone else (which is what he was basically saying).