Gavriella
1,000+ Views

Which 70's Style is for You?

You've probably noticed how 70's fashion is all the rage this summer and coming fall. Whether you love or hate the style, what if you're looking at the wrong 70's styles? Like any period, the 70's gave way to a whole host of styles for different personalities and tastes, and not everyone wore hippie-chic for a decade. Which one of these styles is right for you?

Bohemian

Often confused with hippie-chic, boho style is long and loose, lightweight and flowy. If prints are your thing, opt for washed-out and neutral colors and paisley or delicate florals. If you find yourself reaching for a minidress and knee-high boots, you aren't as boho as you thought; opt for the hippie dippie looks instead. Keep your hair and makeup soft and natural.

Disco

One of the flashier styles of the seventies was disco wear, complete with sequins and lamé. If you don't want to look like you're in a Saturday Night Fever costume, take inspiration with flared jumpsuits and keyholes, plus white on white and pops of orange and pink neon. Feathers and ruffles optional.

Hippie-Chic

The colorful minidresses are a clear indicator of hippie chic, over a long, flowing style that would be classified as more bohemian. Bell bottoms are also acceptable, especially paired with plunging necklines and velvet layers, plus heeled boots of course. Keep your long hair parted in the middle, unless you have bangs, which will do the trick as well.

Sporty 70's

This kind of old-school Americana inspired decades of terry-cloth tracksuits and retro white minidresses. Polo shirts made chic are great tucked into short shorts, worn under track jackets and with simple gold jewelry. Denim can make an appearance too, in the form of relaxed flared jeans, with classic kicks and a primary-color sweater tucked in.

Glam Rock and Punk

From punk rockers to glam rock, this style is more of a spectrum, but the subcultural style ranges from androgynous suits to ripped tees and extra embellishments. If you're trying to introduce this subtly into your style, add more metallics and uninsex pieces before going full-on punk. Don't be afraid to load on the eyeliner, and keep your hair as short as possible.
Comment
Suggested
Recent
Cards you may also be interested in
How to Look Like Stevie Nicks
Whether you love Stevie's solo stuff or are a die-hard Fleetwood Mac fan, you can't deny that the songbird had some killer style back in the day. From her peasant-princess 70's looks to her amped-up 80's style, I'm taking you through Stevie Nicks' style. (Special shout-out to @allischaaff for reminding me how inspirational Ms. Nicks' fashion has been!) 70's In the 1970's, Fleetwood Mac was fresh on the music scene, and Stevie Nicks was the gorgeous lead singer that had an understated bohemian fashion sense envied by all. Her half-up, half-down blonde hairstyle was embellished with eyebrow skimming bangs. She wore plenty of trends of the seventies from peasant blouses to bell-bottoms, but she kept them sultry and simple, often in black, white, or cream. 70's Stevie was not shy of accessorizing, however, and she layered on necklaces and chains as embellishment to her simple dresses and tops. A chain or two would add some subtle glamour to an otherwise breezy and lightweight bohemian look. These aviator sunglasses were also a common look, coyly tucked under her signature bangs. She often wore a kimono, scarf, or shawl draped over her arms for some stylish coverage. 70's For the cameras, Ms. Nicks hammed up her seventies style with brooches, halters, and her flippy, flippy hair. The flared jeans and platform heel combo was then and is now especially cool and relaxed looking, without seeming costumey. 80's ...and then came the 1980's, and our beloved bohemian goddess went through a bit of a transformation. If this is the look you're after, take a comb to your hair, and just start teasing. Gone is Stevie's fresh face, to be replaced with a bright lip and swept-on blush. There's something to say for Stevie's look in the 80's. Perhaps it was over-the-top and bolder than her demure 70's style, but she was also coming into her own and recording solo music at the time, which turned out to be a big success. Her signature pout stayed the same all along, she just added more or less to emphasize those blonde longs and her petite frame. 80's Stevie went in the glam route in the 80's, but merged the boldness of glitter and sequins with a witchy darkness that seperated her from cutsier girl groups of the decade. If you aren't afraid to try some big hair and sparkle, avoid color and drape yourself in feathers and sequins in black for the Stevie effect. "Stand Back" shows more 80's influence than her softer work (like Landslide) with Fleetwood Mac, but she also develops a more nuanced sound that sets her apart from 80's pop, and her dark and enchanting style shows this. Stevie Nicks has been aptly named the fairy godmother of rock. Throw on some layered necklaces and black sequins, and tease up your hair to channel your inner Stevie and feel the girl power course through your veins.
I Can't Believe It's Not ____!: Songs you didn't know were covers
Full disclosure: Neither butter nor its evil counterpart, I Can't Believe It's Not Butter!, have really anything to do with the rest of this card at all. But the name is just so damn catchy and malleable, so, forgive me. Moving on, I'm here to give some love to the original composers and performers of songs that you may not know deserve credit. Sometimes, a song gets buried for years, only to be picked up by a totally different artist (often in a different genre and style), and it's the second version that blows up. In lots of these cases, there is little mention of the original. Let's change that. I Can't Believe It's Not LED ZEPPELIN! Song: "Dazed and Confused" (1969) Original: Jake Holmes (1967) Eerily enough, Jake Holmes actually has some real Robert Plant qualities to his voice. Or maybe Plant ripped his vocal style off of Holmes just like he did one of his best songs. I don't know. Is nothing sacred? I Can't Believe It's Not AMY WINEHOUSE! Song: "Valerie" (2007) Original: The Zutons (2006) The Zutons are kind of a guilty pleasure of mine. They're a not-very-good mid-2000s Brit rock group, but something about the lead singer's voice is really appealing to me. Amy's version is damn-near perfect and is the basis of every A Capella group's top hit, but it wouldn't have been possible without The Zutons. Which is not something that you can say for many things in this world. I Can't Believe It's Not ARETHA FRANKLIN! Song: "Respect" (1967) Original: Otis Redding (1965) Ok, this one is legitimately surprising. I've heard the Otis version a million times and I didn't know that it was his song until recently. The two versions are really, really different, and each is awesome in its own right. It's hard to go wrong with Otis or Aretha. Everyone wins. I Can't Believe It's Not THE BEATLES! Song: "Twist and Shout" (1963) Original: The Isley Brothers (1962) The Isley Brothers didn't actually write this song - Phil Medley and Bert Burns did - but they were the first to chart the song, before The Beatles did a year later. Fun fact: The Beatles recorded Please Please Me, the record that contains this hit, in just 10 hours. Their producer knew that "Twist and Shout" would totally ruin John Lennon's voice because of its demanding style, so he saved it for last, with just 15 minutes of scheduled recording time left. Indeed, it totally blew out Lennon's voice, and, while the producer wanted to do a second take, Lennon just couldn't manage it. Ended up fine, if you ask me. I Can't Believe It's Not ELVIS PRESLEY! Song: "Hound Dog" (1956) Original: Big Mama Thornton (1952) Oh man! OH MAN! Who is Big Mama Thornton, and where has she been? This woman is a force! She also recorded "Ball n' Chain" before Janis Joplin made it a hit. Give the lady some love! This version is fucking awesome! But, yeah, Elvis's is better. Sorry Big Mama. Which one surprises you the most? Do you like the originals better, or the more popular covers? Music community folks: Reveal yourselves!
$265 La Prairie Foundation Review
What..? $265 Foundation? Are you kidding me !! Hahaha .. I guess La Prairie is considered as one of the best skincare brand. Alright.. so we want to know if it is really worth the price! Let's see. She's putting it on.. oh and it actually looks quite thick she's holding the stick but it won't drip off the stick :) hmm guessing it may be matte? Ohhh she said it's got a full coverage and it's very radiant, saying that she probably put too much on... She's a bit surprised on how white she looks on her camera haha. If anyone is planning on getting this one, choose one color darker because it seems it has whiter color than what it actually looks like on the bottle.. she loves the natural look on her face! :) I see it too. I like it too. Now she's going to put on the concealer that is at the top of the bottle. If I... get a chance to purchase this item (which I don't really think so..?), I think it's better to use small amount because she kept saying she has put too much on her face even though it doesnt really look like she put a lot on her face. yeah she's done with the base - drawing her eye brows now. Looks gorgeous. She really loves the texture but worried that it might get oily later on. This picture was taken at 1pm, when she just applied the foundation on. It's been 3 hours since she applied it, and I think it still looks okay. 10 hours later.. no cracks or anything :) whoa.. yeah maybe it's worth the price haha. Anyone planning on getting this product!? full video
6
Comment
2