MAYRARUIZ1
2 years ago1,000+ Views
A RETIRA CARGOS CONTRA EL ABOGADO LEE.La ex novia de el Cantante Kim hyun Joong decide retirar los cargos hechos a su abogado el Doctor Lee (Abogado defensor de cantante)!Ella dice que esto no es la prioridad del caso y que por eso ella retira los cargos (siii.... claro como no, no sera que tiene miedo)También amenazo nuevamente de que si Kim Hyun Joong salia a los medios a hacer entrevista innecesarias, ella lo citaría nuevamente (pero que raro... ella siempre amenazando parece que tienen mucho miedo de los que el pueda llegar a decir)El caso es que hoy mismo ella retiro la demanda que ella misma había puesto contra el abogado de Hyun Joong por difamación!!CREO QUE ESTA MUJER NO SE PONE DE ACUERDO NUNCA,NI CON ELLA MISMA, QUE MIEDO TIENE, SE LE ESTAN ACABANDO LAS MENTIRAS!!
South Korean actor Kim Hyun Joong has released new details about the ongoing legal dispute between him and his ex-girlfriend Ms. Choi.Joong's legal representative Lee Jae Man revealed that a media outlet tried to threaten the actor after his former lover handed over several personal documents to the organisation."A' told Kim Hyun Joong's agency Key East that they possessed the documents. 'A' deny that they threatened Kim Hyun Joong but he was told by his agency (Key East) that 'A' has documents related to Choi," said the defence attorney in an interview with MBN Star.The legal representative even stated that Hyun Joong was worried about the media's possession of those documents. "After he learned [of this], he felt that he was being threatened and attempted to settle by giving 600 million KRW," AllKpop quoted Jae Man as saying. But a representative for Keyeast Entertainment revealed that the media outlet never threatened them but the company "just thought of it as routine coverage".Clarifying the statement, Jae Man said, "Key East claims 'A' media outlet never threatened them, but Kim Hyun Joong concluded that what his agency told him held more credibility than what he heard from Choi."The new revelations were made by Jae Man after Choi filed a lawsuit against her former lover and his defence attorney at Supreme Prosecutors' Office of the Republic of Korea in Seoul."Through the suspects' biased assertions which were revealed through the media, the general public's sentiment recognises my client (Ms. Choi) as a 'gold-digger' and 'blackmailer,' and [Kim Hyun Joong] even finished filing criminal charges against my client for suspicions of blackmail, fraud, and the like on July 23 of last year," read the statement released by Choi's representative
s Choi, the ex-girlfriend of South Korean actor Kim Hyun Joong, filed a lawsuit against the celeb and his legal representative Lee Jae Man on Friday, 7 August.After registering the case at Supreme Prosecutors' Office of the Republic of Korea in Seoul, Ms. Choi released an official statement through her legal representative, explaining the various reasons for making the move against her former lover."Through the suspects' biased assertions which were revealed through the media, the general public's sentiment recognises my client (Ms. Choi) as a 'gold-digger' and 'blackmailer,' and [Kim Hyun Joong] even finished filing criminal charges against my client for suspicions of blackmail, fraud, and the like on July 23 of last year," read the statement.On 5 August, the legal representative of Hyun Joong had released a statement informing the prosecution had banned his ex- girlfriend from leaving Korea, according to Koreaboo."Ms. Choi is suspected of extortion, false accusations, fraud, and defamation. Due to her suspected crimes, a severe punishment is predicted to be imposed on Ms. Choi, whom prosecution has prohibited from leaving the country," he stated.Explaining the court order, Choi's representative stated that the 29-year-old actor is continuously accusing his client to gain public sentiments. "[He] has continuously lied about concerns that my client will flee overseas and how she is hiding something, killing her reputation, doing as they please, and provoking the temporary interest of the public and raising distrust in the lawsuit," he said.The representative even stated that Ms Choi is residing "at Songpa's Bangi-dong for near thirty years" and there is no question of fleeing the country. "She has only conducted a single interview thus far to explain her side of the story. There weren't any protection of influence, [manipulation] from behind the scenes, and no exchanging of money," he added.The legal representative also spoke about the negative impact of the legal dispute on his client's health. "The suspects have continuously imparted great emotional shock and stress to my client, which may cause her to experience a difficult delivery [childbirth]." Although Hyun Joong and his legal representative are yet to respond to the recent lawsuit, they have been denying all of Choi's previous, including the set of conversation records submitted by her in court. Article Published: August 7, 2015 15:37 ISTPost CommentRelatedKim Hyun Joong's Father Opens Up on His Son's Legal Dispute with Ex-Girlfriend Miss ChoiKim Hyun Joong to Face Jail Time for Assaulting Ex-Girlfriend Miss Choi?Will Court Proceedings Affect Professional Lives of Former EXO Members Kris Wu and Luhan? [POLL]MUST READRetail Inflation Down, Factory Output UpInterest Rates Will Fall in Coming Years: JaitleyDelhi Government to Sell Onions at Rs 30 per KgAzim Premji, Shiv Nadar Among Top Tech BillionairesIndian-American Contractor Indicted in $1.9 million FraudRupee Plunges to 2-Year Low on Yuan Devaluation FearsSign inSign inIBTIMES TVPlayAmazon announces Suki Waterhouse as brand ambassadorMOST POPULARMOST SHARED"Bajrangi Bhaijaan" has maintained a good number of footfalls and it might even surpass "PK" numbers.'Bajrangi Bhaijaan' 26-Day Box Office Collection: Salman Starrer to Become Most Watched Film of This Decade? Mahesh Babu's "Srimanthudu" has collected $2,062,768 (Rs 13.17 crore) at the US box office in its first weekend.Box Office Collection: 'Srimanthudu' Tops US Business Chart by Beating 'Bajrangi Bhaijaan', 'Drishyam', 'Baahubali'
0 comments
17
Comment
Share